vendredi 29 mai 2009

Viewpoints-enabled Modeling Tools

This post follows those showing how it's possible to leverage EMF and JBoss Drools to get an interactive model getting updated considering business rules, and how you can get a set of graphical modelers to ease your design tasks and provide feedback while you're building your system.

Now let's focus on providing "the right feedback at the right time". When you're designing a system, you're trying to reach the following goal : building it nicely and making sure it fits your requirements and contraints. You're always balancing between different concerns, your system simplicity, agility, performances, safety ...

Having a good tooling for that is more than important, and the tooling failed since now : it's always providing many more information or possible actions than what you actually need and not what's your focus right now.

Here comes the viewpoints (IEEE) , viewpoints enabled tooling is able to extends, hide, or provide new representations and actions depending on what you want to consider. As building a system is always a trade-off between multiples criteria, you don't want to be overwhelmed with all the constraints feedback, you just want to see relevant information and be able to do relevant actions. The concept is quite similar to the Eclipse perspectives.

The first demo (a few minutes) provides an overview of the tooling specification model we started in the last post. It's been completed with a few more representations, validation rules, and, more important, re-organized in term of viewpoints.


The following demo (6 minutes) shows the usage of such a tooling, using (again) the simple "Flow" example.



Eclipse is great as a platform and enables you to build great tooling to that your users stay focused on their business issues (which are complex enough already) . That's what we are trying to achieve with this product.

Moreover, Eclipse Modeling is a gem mine driven by enthusiastic people, don't wait and come with us, resistance is futile ;)

mercredi 13 mai 2009

The 20 minute Graphical Modeler based on Eclipse

My last post about the flow model simulation was really missing a demo so that you get the "live" aspect of the model construction. No problem, that's a good occasion to show you a secret product we've been building on top of the Eclipse Modeling projects since a few year now. In my dictator position on this product you can guess I'm quite excited to show you that, nothing public came out about it since now but the first public release is not so far...

Let's stop the teasing and watch the content, here are a few flash demos . If you're just interested in the resulting modeler, go directly to the last one showing the live model design. If you don't understand what's about that flow stuff or if you're wondering how all that load and capacities properties gets updated, have a look on my preceding post.


The first demos are showing the graphical modeler construction. In a few clicks, just defining the concepts you want to display, how you want to display them and how to retrieve them in the semantic model. You get your modeler in a matter of minutes, and you really should not need more than that as it's quite simple.

I really like the "specifying the modeler and using it side by side" feature even if you need a big display for that and here for the demo I have no choice than scrolling.

The next demo is focused on defining "conditional styles" so that the graphical shapes changes depending on the changes in the semantic model (node/edge sizes and colors), in this demo I also specify the fact that a CompositeProcessor reuse the graphical mappings define for the diagram and that I should be able to create a sub diagram on a CompositeProcessor.
The request langage I'm using is Acceleo, but you could also use OCL, I tend to prefer simplicity ;)


And at last, after a bit more tweaking off stage, the usage of this finished dynamic modeler.



So, to be fair, the final modeler is more a 25 minute modeler than 20, but that said, I get a first working modeler a the minute 10 of the first demo.

Be sure that's only a tiny portion of what we've been able to achieve leveraging the Eclipse Modeling components (EMF, GMF, Acceleo, Compare just naming a few...) and the Eclipse Platform : graphic modeler are one thing, but other representation matters and I'm not even speaking about the "full viewpoint support".

Stay tuned for more eye candy ;)

mardi 5 mai 2009

Live Models Using JBoss Rules (Drools) and EMF

Modeling Kata here again ! Models are useful to describe things, systems, knowledge, basically any information you want to organize and formalize will gain in using a solid formalism like Ecore.

Structuring and describing is nice, but then most of the time you need to evaluate your design. You basically have choices here, one of them is using the validation tools so that any "error in your design" is shown to you and so that you can fix it. The drawback of validation is that you can't easily get the big picture of your design quality corresponding to the constraints you defined.

Who can say that this bees invading my garden are organized in a nice or poor way ? That's definitely not a binary information.


Another approach is designing your models with tooling updating or self-constructing other part to gives you information about its quality. Let's take a (quite naive but still interesting ;) ) example :

I defined a formalism for a "flow-like" langage, you can use it to describe DataSources and Processors linked by DataFlows. Processors and DataFlows are capacity bounded, which mean they've got a maximum capacity and under given load will be iddling or over used.

Here is a class diagram displaying the simplest parts of the flow.ecore :
Here I'm mixing both the information I'll describe (a given system with datasources, processors and flows) and the feedback about my design (the flow element usage).

Note that every element here might be activated or not (see the FlowElementStatus enumeration).

Now to define my rules updating each values considering the overall model, I basically have the choice either to implement that in Java, or use a Rules Engine. Implementing in Java might look like a good idea but you'll quickly realise that :
  • adapting the rules to a constraints which are specific for a project will make you redeploy everything
  • you'll write code to browse everywhere in the model and update the values depending on your browsing result, and with big models you'll get poor performances
That said, this exercise is interesting and might be the subject of another kata.

You bet I picked the Rules Engine, so that I can get my hands dirty with those strange beasts you (most of the time) never ever want to meet again after you graduated. I picked JBoss Drools which seemd just nice, powerfull, and based on an implementation of a Rete-like algorithm - which make it fast - and I have to admit I liked their logo is really cool.

EMF and Drools are going along really nicely. Drools considers your Java instances as facts and is then really easy to integrate with EMF. EMF provides the generic notification mechanism which make it really easy to integrate with drools so that drools know that something changed and that he might have some work to do.

Here is the result, let's design a flow related to my work :
Freddy is a datasource which produces lots of information (8). He's inactive right now (see the red icon ;) )

Let's add Laurent which is way more quiet, "Me" which is a processor both being a flow target and a flow source, as I'm providing data to "My Computer". My Capacity is 10, my computer has way more capacity than me.

Let's connect everybody with DataFlows, each of them having a max capacity of 10.
Freddy and Laurent are both connected to Me, and I'm connected to My Computer.

Everybody is inactive, let's activate some part of the system : Me and My Computer.
As long as Freddy and Laurent are not there, everything is fine, my usage is "low".
Activating elements in the editor, everything gets updated "on the fly" and the labels are reflecting the current usage of an element.

Now Laurent is activated. Everything is still fine (you kind a guess the next step, right ? ;) )


Freddy is activated, I'm over stressed (see the red) and even the dataflow from Freddy to me has quite an high usage (orange color).

So now I have different options, I can redesign my system in a way that the capacities are higher (for me and/or the dataflow), or split parts of the Freddy flow and distribute it on other processors. I'll be able to try every solution, activate/desactivate elements, and see if my system is meeting my constraints or not.

Now let's have a look on how I did that...

Here are the rules I'm using, quite straightforward and it's easy to put more rules expressing really complicated constraints.

This language is dedicated to the logic rules definition and is, as a matter of fact, good at it.

Mixing drools and EMF has just been about setting up an adapter on my resource when loading the model, then if something gets updated, EMF tell drools which instance changed, and drools fire the corresponding rules, chaining them if needed.

I'm not the first one doing that, googling a bit you'll find papers.

Quick reminder of what's nice with this approach :
  • not re-inventing the wheel again
  • great expressiveness for your rules
  • great performances even with many many many rules
  • rules are easy to customize and you don't need to change your code to consider new construction rules.
Stay tuned and feel free to provide feedback on a similar or different approach !